Seleccionar página

The latest conception out of sociosexuality is served by become checked out

With respect to the «lingering concept of thinking about small-identity and you can a lot of time-title mating because the not-being opposite posts», we currently put this idea in the earlier sorts of the newest manuscript (today in pp. 4-5, lines 91-108):

So it antique view of mating positioning could have been criticized because of the certain article authors, instance Jackson and Kirkpatrick , just who advertised one to small-title and you may much time-term positioning needn’t become reverse posts, but dimensions one, while negatively related, is going to be differentiated. Various other scientists demonstrated the new appropriateness off leaving the antique unidimensional position out of small-label orientations and you can playing an excellent multidimensional position . e., past sociosexual decisions), attitudes (we.age., thinking about casual gender), and you can attract (we.age., pleasure because of probability of relaxed sex). However, it is still prominent you to definitely boffins still study mating steps instance face-to-face poles and you may sociosexuality away from a great unidimensional approach once they learn group correlates.

«A condition to be good option would be you to dating software users is enough time-identity centered otherwise, at least, as long-term situated just like the general people.» It matter is none feel handled, nor replied throughout the shot, come across 2nd point.

Response: Following the your testimonial i’ve altered so it phrase (pp. 5-6, outlines 128-130): “A condition for being an excellent solution is one matchmaking applications pages try enough time-title built otherwise, no less than, so long-identity situated as low-users”. not, you will find perhaps not managed to find the “2nd point” which had been connected to this dilemma. Thus, i simply altered this issue regarding your first area of the reviewer’s opinion.

A major section is the claiming to have generalizability of shot when you’re there are one or two exceptions produced: Once: Decades was minimal of 18 to help you twenty-six.

Response: Thanks for your own feedback. The audience is unsure on which is the problem with the very last test ages. From your insights, there are 2 possibilities. First, our very own take to can’t be general to any or all population. We fully accept it. Which is why why, already in the earlier version of the fresh manuscript, we within the Talk section (today from inside the p. 15, outlines 336-340):

Almost every other restrictions had been associated with the latest representativeness of your decide to try and the newest generalization of your show. Among final participants, the fresh try are mostly girls, old between 18 and you may twenty-six, unmarried and you may from university, making the overall performance difficult to generalize to all or any college students and you may, nevertheless less to younger non-university students.

Second, when your problem is so you can exclude people additional you to a long time, so it choice was developed to be uniform and you may defined into the inclusion standards of earlier education conducted which have college products (get a hold of, for example: Barrada mais aussi al., 2018; Barrada mais aussi al., 2019; Castro and you can Santos-Iglesias, 2016; Castro et al., 2020; Fernandez del Rio et al., 2019). This looks in the malfunction of the study’s introduction conditions (today, during the p. six, traces 144-19). We chose to be consistent all over education to minimize researchers’ amounts out of independence and, for this reason, stop prospective p-hacking. This new difference requirements towards decades are predetermined and you will consistent in all the education.

This consists of sociosexual decisions (we

Second: Just some one considering by themselves because the men or women was indeed utilized in the newest analyses (they also will be fell and you can thought to be missing regarding the regression).

Hence, such, it is possible to attract a reliable relationships and, if you are trying they, look after numerous sexual dating without union [twenty seven,28]

Response: In terms of people that do not select themselves as the guys otherwise girls, as can get noticed regarding the area Professionals (today, within the p. six, lines 144-19), there had been thirteen folks from an initial sample of 1,996, and this signifies 0.65% of this attempt. Because of the small size of the try of professionals (already very small in advance of other exception criteria had been applied), it was ple. With instance a finite test dimensions, mathematical strength could be very low. Also, it is not you’ll to combine this group with some of the two vast majority sex identities.